This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
This article was copy edited by Corinne, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on 19 August 2016.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
A fact from Bohemond III of Antioch appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 9 December 2016 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
WP:WIAGA#Immediate_failures states that an article can, but by no means must, be failed without further review (known as "quick failing") if, prior to the review:
it is a long way from meeting any one of the six good article criteria:
There is no reason for immediate failure. I have added the GA criteria above and will check each of these as part of the detailed review to commence soon. Thanks. Jack | talk page15:05, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I've reviewed this in detail now and it's an informative, well-written and well-presented piece of work. The only little criticism I had, which I've resolved myself, was that there were several redlinks. I've removed those links but you can always relink them if and when the relevant articles are created. As you can see from the checklist above, I can't see any problems (e.g., images, neutrality, citations) and it passes all criteria. I'm closing the review now with GA=pass. Well done. Jack | talk page14:42, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]