Talk:Chase Promenade

Chase Promenade has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones Date Process Result September 17, 2008 Good article nominee Listed October 2, 2008 Peer review Reviewed October 9, 2008 Good topic candidate Promoted January 25, 2022 Featured topic removal candidate Demoted A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on June 17, 2008. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the Chase Promenade (pictured) hosted a monthlong Museum of Modern Ice exhibit of abstract art on a 95 by 12 feet (29.0 by 3.7 m) wall of ice called Paintings Below Zero? Current status: Good article

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Illinois Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Chicago Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Chase Promenade/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

This article is satisfactory. Use of a good lead section, as well as the use of images to illustrate the article. Good referencing, and no grammatical errors. As the article is for a WP:GT, I would say that it makes it. Some expansion would be good though. If any other reviewers have comments, they would be much appreciated. --Jordan ^Contribs 14:23, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]