Talk:Conflict management

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Military history: Biography / Technology This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met Associated task forces: /  Military biography task force Military science, technology, and theory task force

I believe that we need to add: -

A section that discusses approaches to conflict management from an Internatonal Relations point of view: This wikipage is rather psychology/business-centric and would benefit from someone who is knowledgeable in International Relations to write up a section on conflict management from a perspective in that discipline. Please look into this!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.206.73.120 (talk) 02:19, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Approaches - Traditional ie avoid conflict (conflict is bad) Human Resources ie accept conflict (conflict is inevitable) Interactionalist ie promote and manage conflict (conflict is essential)

and also discuss - Fuctional vs Dysunctional conflict (Coning, Dyck) Conflict vs dispute (taxonomy)(Fenn) Integrative vs Distributive solutions (Ury and Fisher, Lax and Sebenius) various models of managing conflict Affective vs Cognitive conflict (Amason)

Parasite 03:39, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]