Talk:Crystallographic image processing

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Chemistry Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Physics Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

I don't think there is anything wrong with this article. From the style differences, one can still tell that it has been written by several authors over time. More detailed discussions that are backed up by a long list of references make a lot of sense to scientists - that is actually what they are looking for in any review article. Sure the general public is not interested in science at the active research scientist level, so what? Worst cause of action would be to water a good article down because a professional wikipedia editor thinks the general public has a problem with this article? Kind regards, Peter Moeck, Professor of Physics — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.5.175.148 (talk) 02:12, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]