Talk:Curley Byrd

	Curley Byrd has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones Date Process Result August 20, 2010 Good article nominee Listed

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Science and Academia / Sports and Games This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the science and academia work group. This article is supported by the sports and games work group (assessed as Low-importance). College football Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject College football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of college football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.College footballWikipedia:WikiProject College footballTemplate:WikiProject College footballcollege football articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Maryland Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Maryland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Maryland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MarylandWikipedia:WikiProject MarylandTemplate:WikiProject MarylandMaryland articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Higher education This article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education articles Running Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Running, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of running on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RunningWikipedia:WikiProject RunningTemplate:WikiProject RunningRunning articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. To-do list: edit history watch purge tag all running related articles with {{WikiProject Running}} adding assessment and importance parameters when missing find references for articles listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject Running/Unreferenced BLPs adopt an article and promote it to GA Baseball: College Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Baseball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of baseball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BaseballWikipedia:WikiProject BaseballTemplate:WikiProject BaseballBaseball articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject College baseball. Athletics Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Athletics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the sport of athletics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page and join the discussion.AthleticsWikipedia:WikiProject AthleticsTemplate:WikiProject AthleticsAthletics articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Curley Byrd/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 03:45, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Overall, this is a good article, though I have a couple concerns:

• "In 1932, Byrd was promoted to vice president of the university.[1] In July 1935, he was named acting president of the university.[1] Byrd was officially appointed president in February 1936" This could probably be combined into one or two sentence; would make for better flow I think.

• Y Combined the second two sentences. Strikehold (talk) 04:17, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• "until the former coach interceded to restore order." by former coach, do you mean Bryant or Byrd here? Slightly confusing.

• Y Ah, I didn't even think of that when I wrote it, but you are right, both were former coaches at that time. I meant Bryant. Clarified. Strikehold (talk) 04:17, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• "Tatum and asked Cross to refute Tatum's role," huh? perhaps that meant to say 'had asked'. Plus, the second Tatum can just say his.

• Y Yeah that was a typo. Fixed. Strikehold (talk) 04:17, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• "Byrd had Maryland accept the bowl bid, despite coach Tatum's disagreement. Tatum felt the sanctions, which prevented Maryland from playing any Southern Conference games the following season, were too harsh." So Tatum disagreed with allowing the bowl bid, yet found the sanctions harsh? Sounds like he would be the one in support of the bowl game then, or am I misreading?

• Y Tatum did not want to accept the bowl because it would make his schedule much harder (almost all road games), and he didn't think it was worth it. (They knew the Southern Conference would suspend them from conference games for the season if they accepted). Byrd wanted to accept the bowl bid anyway, and his opinion carried the day. Strikehold (talk) 04:17, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• "Byrd was also a businessman" maybe I'm nitpicking, but I'm sure we can think of a better sentence to start the section.

• Y I tried rewording it a bit. Let me know if that's better or if you have a catchier starting sentence. Strikehold (talk) 04:17, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'll place the article on hold and will pass it when the issues are fixed. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 03:45, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I attempted to make changes where you expressed concerns, and believe the article is now ready for a second look. Please let me know if that addressed your concerns or not, and if you think any further changes should be made. Thanks! Strikehold (talk) 04:17, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Everything looks good now, so I'll pass the article as a GA. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 15:26, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]