Talk:DSRP

This page was proposed for deletion by Wikicleanerthinker (talk · contribs) on 15 January 2017 with the comment: no indication of significance that warrants a Wikipedia page It was contested by 67.241.65.130 (talk · contribs) on 18 January 2017

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Articles for creation This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles This article was accepted on 11 March 2012 by reviewer NTox (talk · contribs).

Is it a scientific theory? What hypotheses does it have? Are these hypotheses falsifiable and testable? Are there experiments to test these hypotheses? What are results of these experiments? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.72.8.29 (talk) 00:46, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DSRP does not seem to be an accepted theory as claimed in this article. Probably does not warrant a page on Wikipedia as it has seen hardly any recognition by others outside of the theory's author. Please consider deletion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brillema (talk • contribs) 22:09, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DSRP Theory is widely accepted in the field of systems thinking and written about in refereed publications. It is also the subject of the Routledge Handbook of Systems Thinking (2018) and described by world-renowned systems thinking scholars as the fourth wave of systems thinking. It was the central theme of a 2017 conference at Cornell University which had attendance of over 700 people and it has received millions of dollars in government funding for research. The claims made as to the deletion of this page are likely being made by those uninformed of the systems thinking field as a discipline or of modern systems thinking practice or by practitioners who support competing theories of systems thinking. 67.241.65.130 (talk) 12:42, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The previous comment is full of rhetoric that sounds to me like unsupported exaggeration ("world-renowned"! "THE fourth wave"! "millions of dollars in government funding"!). Citation needed, as we say on Wikipedia. Biogeographist (talk) 14:15, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Re Routledge Handbook of Systems Thinking: note that Cabrera is a co-editor, also therefore has some character of being primary source. (It's also not an actual source yet,) Humanengr (talk) 19:33, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]