 | This is an archive of past discussions about Diana Vickers. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
It's come back again. I'm going to reinstate the redirect on these grounds:
- The AfD was closed, and there has since been no consensus to restore this as a separate article.
- The information still gives no evidence, let alone sourced evidence, that she has established independent notability.
- It was reverted to a version in which the table is messy, apparently from before cleanups were made prior to the AfD.
- User:Hithere2008 has been restore-warring against consensus; at the moment it seems that the article is here only as a result of this.
If a reason to restore this as an independent article crops up, please discuss here first. -- Smjg (talk) 15:33, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
Well If lower placed Ruth Lorenzo has an article why hasn't she they have both been signed 86.161.252.78 (talk) 22:49, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
- The question is not of why Diana doesn't have an article, but of why Ruth does. I'm not sure. But the real criterion is notability, not whether "signed" or not. And anyway, two wrongs don't make a right. -- Smjg (talk) 01:41, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
I'd like to know why the page was deleted yet Ruth Lorenzo who is unsigned has a page and has nothing that makes her need a page, when deleting the page for Diana i was told it was because she hasnt released any music, well neither has Ruth. --Hithere2008 (talk) 18:02, 27 February 2009 (UTC)