Talk:Electronic warfare officer

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Military history: Aviation This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met Associated task forces: /  Military aviation task force

This article is extremely outdated for current EWO training. It also contains gross errors. Cizzo 03:02, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I concur. It is also very USAF-centric; other armed services and other nations use EWOs, both in airborne and surface based platforms and facilities. It's a small point, but EWOs are not limited to denying the effective use of the E-M spectrum; they also exploit its use by an enemy/adversary by sensing and capturing/recording and analysing the details of the transmissions etc.

An EW operator in the Royal Navy (rarely is such a person a commissioned 'officer') is sometimes referred to as a "Golly". I do not know the derivation (Gollywog?) and wonder if and how that information might be incorporated and linked in Wikipedia.EWoc 14:42, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently, it alluded to the golliwog metal badges that were available if you sent in 10 (?) labels from a Robertson's Jam jar in the UK. The idea being that EWOs were promoted other than on merit. EWoc (talk) 18:57, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]