Talk:Europium compounds

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Europium compounds/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Keresluna (talk · contribs) 15:58, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a. (reference section):
    b. (citations to reliable sources):
    c. (OR):
    d. (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a. (major aspects):
    b. (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
    b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/fail:

(Criteria marked are unassessed)

I will take on reviewing the article. It looks fine at first glance, but I'll look at it more thoroughly. Keres🌕Luna edits! 16:00, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

First comments

[edit]
  • Random ref check: reference 37 supports the statement that 'Europium triisopropylocene is a brown solid that can be reacted with hydrogen peroxide to give cyclopentadiene europium peroxide', could not find it in the article. Keres🌕Luna edits! 21:09, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I cannot access this source. 141Pr {contribs} 11:49, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If the source cannot be verified, it should be removed with the following statement, or another reference should be found. Keres🌕Luna edits! 16:53, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Couldn't find any refs for that, so I removed it. 141Pr {contribs} 20:54, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • 'Eu(fod)3 serves as a Lewis acid' what does fod stand for?
Made more clear what the fod stood for. 141Pr {contribs} 11:47, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • The aspect that Europium compounds fluoresce under UV is a pretty important topic, and I don't see anywhere explaining why or at least how in the article, only mentioned briefly in the captions. This probably fails Criterion 3a, as it fails to introduce a major aspect.
I have addressed it in the lead, although I don't think it needs any further info. 141Pr {contribs} 12:35, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Earwig found minor plagiarism on 'Europium(III) phosphide is a semiconductor used in high power, high-frequency applications and in laser diodes.', which the statement is copied off from ref 43. Also, American elements is not a reliable source according to WP:VENDOR.
Removed sentence along with the source. 141Pr {contribs} 19:45, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • The captions of the images are unreferenced, especially the statement that 'Europium compounds fluoresce under UV light at 395 nm and 365 nm.'
Added a reference to the caption of the top video, couldn't find refs for the reaction one. 141Pr {contribs} 12:37, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Added a table, although I don't see why it should be sortable. 141Pr {contribs} 12:26, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • The article is missing information on europium selenides, and should be added in the chalcogenides section.
Added info about other europium chalcogenides apart from sulfides. 141Pr {contribs} 12:57, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Done. 141Pr {contribs} 16:01, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

These comments would take a long time, I'll get started later. 141Pr {contribs} 08:30, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I will put it on hold until the comments are addressed. Keres🌕Luna edits! 14:15, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Keresluna: I have addressed all comments, it didn't actually take that long. 141Pr {contribs} 16:01, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Is there any information about europium pnictogenides? If not, add information about them too. Keres🌕Luna edits! 16:37, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I could only find information about the nitride and phosphide, but not the arsenide, antimonide and bismuthide. Is that OK? 141Pr {contribs} 17:58, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, that is okay. Keres🌕Luna edits! 19:02, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Done. 141Pr {contribs} 16:42, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I have added information about europium arsenides if that's okay. Keres🌕Luna edits! 21:25, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, that's fine 141Pr {contribs} 06:23, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Prose

[edit]

I think that would be it for my prose and grammar comments. Keres🌕Luna edits! 00:08, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

References

[edit]

Page numbers needed: 3, 5, 6, 21, 28

Dead link: 4

I think that would be it for the references. Keres🌕Luna edits! 00:18, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

3:  Already done.
4:  Fixed.
5: can't access.
 Done Keres🌕Luna edits! 04:38, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
6: can't access.
Changed reference. Keres🌕Luna edits! 04:38, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
21:  Fixed.
28: can't access.
 Done Keres🌕Luna edits! 04:38, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
That's all I can do, hopefully someone else can help. 141Pr {contribs} 17:57, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Praseodymium-141: I have numbered the references, and will pass it. Keres🌕Luna edits! 04:40, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]