Talk:Forge Park/495 station

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Forge Park/495 station/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Sammi Brie (talk · contribs) 05:26, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·


Almost there. It's been a while, so give it a once-over. 7-day hold to Pi.1415926535. Sammi Brie (she/her • tc) 05:26, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Sammi Brie: Thanks for the review! All easy issues to fix. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:38, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Sammi Brie Just want to confirm - has this article passed, or is there still more to do? I was a bit confused by this edit that another editor made, and wanted to check before I changed the Wikiproject templates to GA. Cheers, Pi.1415926535 (talk) 17:39, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Pi.1415926535 I intended it for listing. I use a nomination handling script by Novem Linguae that did not work properly because this article has a slash in its title and had the bug reported (User talk:Novem Linguae/Scripts/GANReviewTool). Sammi Brie (she/her • tc) 18:17, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copy changes

[edit]
  • "sooner after" is this a mistake?
    •  Done
  • Service on the line, by then down to a single daily mixed train ended in 1920. Complete the appositive by adding a comma after "train"
    •  Done
  • The station opened on June 2, 1988 as remember your DATECOMMA
    •  Done
  • The MBTA initially leased ticket booth and concession stand to the town for $1 annually add "the" after "leased"
    •  Done
  • a potential extension to Woonsocket, Rhode Island via remember your GEOCOMMA
    •  Done

Sourcing and spot checks

[edit]

Earwig finds no issues (3.8%). Five sources were chosen for a spot check, no issues found:

  • 11: I trust you here. I can't find the station because I can't get sufficient resolution on the map image. Another ref was chosen instead...
    • 1: Researched timeline of MBTA service changes. I presume this is considered an RS?
      • Yes - Belcher is an officer of the Boston Street Railway Association (and the original version of the timeline was published by them). I did manage to find a higher-resolution copy of the atlas for source 1.
  • 15: Unionville is not mentioned, presumably because it wasn't even part of the case.
  • 18: MBTA approval for 365-space parking lot in Franklin.
  • 20: Mention of Franklin Youth Services use of profits.
  • 21: Has to be combined with #1 to get the fact, but works to bolster #1.

Other items

[edit]
  • No concerns about the images which are all libre licensed and have alt text.
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.