Talk:Geography of the United Kingdom

'The United Kingdom continues to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.' How can we change this so that it's not time sensitive? Jerry 03:41, 12 Oct 2004 (UTC)

'As of 2004'? 'In [date] the UK committed itself to continuing ...' I'm afraid I don't have the facts to hand. -- ALoan (Talk) 11:33, 12 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Help reduce some of the red links on the page: a high amount of red links is a factor that may stop this article becoming a Featured Article in the future. -- Graham ☺ | Talk 01:09, 13 Oct 2004 (UTC)

• The UK has a new alias, it seems: "Chicken butt" has been added to the first sentence in the article, but is not present on the edit page. I'm not sure how to remove it. Ideas? 188.23.46.31 (talk) 21:19, 1 December 2010 (UTC) Dorklord

• Geology seems topheavy, compared to the level of detail in the rest of the article (for example: demographics; natural resources). Rather than pruning geology more, the others could do with exanding.
• Many sections are just lists (e.g. hills and mountains, rivers and lakes) some of which are by no means comprehensive (inlets, headlands)
• Environment is a bit of a mess:
  • Current issues only mentions greenhouse gases, landfill and recycling. What about industry, pollution (air, water, soil), demand for house building, conservation, coastal erosion, habitat loss, intensive farming...
  • The second section is just a list of agreements from the CIA Factbook - does it add much? Can the unlinked ones be linked to anything useful?
    • Could the agreements themselves be stated instead of the issues - e.g. Convention on Biological Diversity has a wiki page. --Flit 19:41, 26 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• Could do with some nicer images

-- ALoan (Talk) 16:16, 18 Oct 2004 (UTC)

XD