 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
"Although there are the obvious privacy concerns in surveillance, one can also argue that due to the high risk nature of terrorism, such surveillance is warranted, as it is in other high risk areas like bathing complexes where surveillance is often used because of the risk of drowning. In these cases the importance of safety may often be thought to outweigh privacy concerns."
Couldn't this be better worded to be more neutral? It brings up privacy concerns only to show why they 'may' be unfounded, or, at least, inconsequential. I hardly believe such concerns are so easily dismissed. While this article is about a different topic than privacy, I believe such problems should either not be brought up (and so seemingly easily dismissed) or put in a more neutral way, necessarily expanding this portion of the article. I doubt this will be changed, but perhaps someone like myself will come upon this article and what I have written and feel more comfortable editing the article, knowing that they aren't the only ones who feel there is something wrong with it. Masema (talk) 19:54, 23 April 2008 (UTC)