This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Illusion of asymmetric insight article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
This could be compared to the encapsulation concept of Object Oriented Programming. In order to use, or interact, with the object/unit (whether indivual or social 'group') you do not need to know how it works internally, just understand how you can interact and what to expect in return. The units understand how they work and the motivations behind the behaviours they output. They tend to take note of their thoughts and not their actions. It is not necessary for people to understand why you behave the way you do, just know what to expect in return to them. And that is the side of you they understand, which is also the only part which they need to.
Both the outside units and the units themselves understand what is appropriate to them, which is why they each see their perspective to be more important. 00iddy (talk) 06:51, 17 June 2009 (UTC)