Talk:Javolution

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Java Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Java, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Java on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JavaWikipedia:WikiProject JavaTemplate:WikiProject JavaJava articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter. Computing This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.

Hello,

Several of us noticed this article. While the Javolution product appears to be sufficiently notable to merit inclusion in Wikipedia, a suggestions to avoid the appearance of spam (which is not allowed on Wikipedia):

• Product logos generally go into infoboxes, and should be scaled appropriately--a logo that spans the width of the page is considered poor style. I've made this change.
• Some more external links would be appropriate; in particular, those which provide external commentary or review. A link to the project home page is important (and should be kept), but other independent sources of information should be referenced as well.

I've also tagged this article as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Computer science. At any rate, welcome to Wikipedia! --EngineerScotty 17:09, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]