Talk:Joey Hamilton

Good articleJoey Hamilton has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Did You Know Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 16, 2009Good article nomineeNot listed
July 4, 2009Good article nomineeListed
July 16, 2009Peer reviewReviewed
August 8, 2009Featured article candidateNot promoted
September 26, 2009Peer reviewReviewed
November 3, 2009Featured article candidateNot promoted
January 21, 2010Peer reviewReviewed
July 8, 2010Peer reviewReviewed
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on May 1, 2009.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Joey Hamilton held five baseball records at Georgia Southern University until 1995?
Current status: Good article


GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Joey Hamilton/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

From a look through this article, I'll have to fail it. It's not a bad article, it just needs a lot of work done yet, it's not really complete. For example:

  • Lead needs to be more than one sentence.
  • Where'd he attend high school? Did he play other sports?
  • College info is pretty good, though adding in more detail would help.
  • What minor league teas did he play for in the Padres' farm system?
  • There is nothing on 1995-1998. He was a starter those seasons, and to have nothing makes for a very incomplete article. (this alone would be GA-fail-worthy)
  • The Toronto/Cincy sections aren't as bad, but again, more expansion.
  • Basically, try and expand everything. It's a nice start but not a complete work.

The good thing about recent baseball pitchers is that there are a LOT of sources at your disposal. Even going through google news and adding things in can get you a 20kb+ article in no time. I could certainly help you out if you'd like, though common names make google searching a bit harder. Wizardman 19:29, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Joey Hamilton/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

I'll be reading through this article, and within the next day or two, will post the review here. JamieS93 13:04, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    I did some copyediting and minor cleanup.
    • He was then called up for the second straight season to the Wichita Wranglers - I've seen similar terminology in sports-related articles (being "called up to the roster"), but "second straight season with the Wichita Wranglers", or something similar, might flow better.
    • With the Padres in 1998, which turned out to be Hamilton's last in San Diego, he had a 13-13 record, 4.27 ERA in 34 starts and 217.1 innings pitched - Hamilton's last what?
    • Around the 1998 trade deadline there was a rumored trade that would send Pete Harnisch to San Diego and Hamilton to the Detroit Tigers but the trade never materialized. - I'm confused in the beginning of the sentence, with the trade's deadline being introduced first.
      • Reworded to There was a rumored trade around the 1998 MLB trade deadline that would send Hamilton to the Detroit Tigers but the trade never materialized.--Giants27 (c|s) 21:51, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • a started 20 games and came in relief in 22 games - is "relief" a baseball term? Otherwise, it doesn't seem to fit there.
    • with Cincinnati before bouncing around training camps and the minor leagues (from the lead) - something like "transferring" would be better than the colloquial "bouncing".
    • Footnotes 4, 9, 10, 11, and 16 have no publisher info.
    • All sources that are part of a larger publication should be italicized in the refs, or switched from "publisher=" to the "work=" parameter (i.e., newspapers like Los Angeles Times, Houston Chronicle, etc.) Also, Baseball-Reference.com seems to be web-only, so I don't think it should be in italics.
    • If possible, could you link all of the publishers that have articles? Either that, or delink BR.com. If you do link all the publishers, link the first instance only.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    He was granted free agency on October 30, 2002. Is that sourced?
    Sourced it.--Giants27 (c|s) 21:53, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    Looks good enough to me, it seems to follow most/all of his career.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    No image, but that's fine.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    This is a nice article and a near-complete work. I have placed it on hold and look forward to passing it once the above issues are addressed. Good luck. :-) JamieS93 21:03, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I took another glance through (the first point is not a big deal), and am passing the article as a GA now. Congratulations! A nice independence day Good Article for ya, enjoy. :-) Best, JamieS93 23:09, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, you have a great July 4th, too.--Giants27 (c|s) 23:14, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]