Talk:Josephoartigasia

Josephoartigasia has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: December 27, 2022. (Reviewed version).

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Mammals Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mammal-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MammalsWikipedia:WikiProject MammalsTemplate:WikiProject Mammalsmammal articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Palaeontology Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Rodents Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rodents, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of rodents on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RodentsWikipedia:WikiProject RodentsTemplate:WikiProject RodentsRodent articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Rodents to-do list: edit history watch purge Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Drafts Cleanup : Beaver dam • Bolivian hemorrhagic fever • Campbell's dwarf hamster • Fancy mouse • Golden hamster • Guinea pig breed Expand : Bolivian hemorrhagic fever • Least chipmunk (requested) • California ground squirrel (requested) • Lemming (requested) Merge : List of literary accounts of the Pied Piper • Mousetrap NPOV : Birbalomys • Gambian pouched rat • Golden hamster • Hamster ball • Mountain Beaver • Pacarana • Plague (disease) • Prairie dog • Rat-catcher • Syrian hamster variations • The Rats (novel) • Tree squirrel Stubs : Rodent stubs Update : Baird's pocket gopher • Beaver • Black squirrel • Chinchilla • Cypriot mouse • Eurasian beaver • House mouse • Rabies Verify : Acouchi • Aethomys • Ailuravus • Allegheny woodrat • American red squirrel • Anatole (mouse) • Anomalomyidae • Apodemus • Arctic ground squirrel • Argentine hemorrhagic fever • Armintomys • Batomys • Beaver • Beaver dam • Black-tailed prairie dog • Blesmol • Bobak marmot • Eligmodontia • Guinea pig • Mountain beaver • North American beaver • Tokudaia Wikify : Baird's pocket gopher • Golden hamster • Indian giant flying squirrel Other : photo requests Uruguay This article is part of WikiProject Uruguay, an attempt to expand, improve and standardise the content and structure of articles related to science and technology in Uruguay. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of objectives.UruguayWikipedia:WikiProject UruguayTemplate:WikiProject UruguayUruguay articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Josephoartigasia/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: AryKun (talk · contribs) 15:01, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

• I've given the article a general copyedit; you can revert any changes you disagree with.
• "physicist Rudemar Ernesto Blanco" Why was a physicist describing a new species?

Physics is the language of the natural world, it's a pretty versatile title. He's employed in the engineering department at the Montevideo institute of physics Dunkleosteus77 (talk) 15:34, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• "interprismatic" gloss

done Dunkleosteus77 (talk) 15:34, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• What does suboval and sub rectangular mean?

not quite but almost oval/rectangular Dunkleosteus77 (talk) 15:34, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Could you gloss this? AryKun (talk) 04:02, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Should I just say "almost quadrilateral" instead of "subquadrilateral"? Dunkleosteus77 (talk) 14:16, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, that'll work. AryKun (talk) 01:44, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• For the dental formula, you alternatively write the numbers as subscripts and superscripts. Does this have some meaning?

lower and upper tooth Dunkleosteus77 (talk) 15:34, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Link mesiodistal and linguolabial

I'm not really sure to where. Mesial and distal are used to describe location along the tooth row, and lingual and labial are used to describe location on the flat faces of a tooth Dunkleosteus77 (talk) 15:34, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Gloss temporal

I'm not sure what to write beyond "on the temporal bone" Dunkleosteus77 (talk) 15:34, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• "became big" I feel like "evolved the same body shape" would be a better gloss.

We're not sure of the body shape since we only have the skull Dunkleosteus77 (talk) 15:34, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• "Since germination...hypothesis")." Doesn't really seem directly relevant to Josephoartigasia's feeding habits.

I'm trying to relate it back to the ecology of animals with large bite forces, but it does get lost Dunkleosteus77 (talk) 15:34, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• The images are all properly licensed and relevant.
• The references are all reliable and properly formatted.
• Spot-checks (ref numbers from this revision)
  • Ref 5: Supports claims made
  • Ref 17: Supports all claims made.
  • Ref 18: Supports all claims made.
• Nice work overall. AryKun (talk) 15:21, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• The language still feels a bit technical but I guess that's unavoidable when writing about such a specialized topic. Will be passing. AryKun (talk) 15:56, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]