Talk:KEF

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Companies To-do: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes Maintain : Portal:Companies Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs Other : Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner Answer requests for comments Brands Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Electronics Low‑importance This article is part of WikiProject Electronics, an attempt to provide a standard approach to writing articles about electronics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Leave messages at the project talk pageElectronicsWikipedia:WikiProject ElectronicsTemplate:WikiProject Electronicselectronic articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Musical Instruments Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Musical Instruments, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of musical instruments on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Musical InstrumentsWikipedia:WikiProject Musical InstrumentsTemplate:WikiProject Musical Instrumentsmusical instruments articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Industrial design Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Industrial design, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Industrial design on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Industrial designWikipedia:WikiProject Industrial designTemplate:WikiProject Industrial designIndustrial design articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Guild of Copy Editors This article was copy edited by Dhtwiki, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on 15–17 September 2024.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles

The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. Freemeg1120 (talk · contribs)

This article seems to have been almost entirely lifted from here - surely a copyright violation? Since the person who added all this content is an anon, it will be difficult to contact them to ask. Unless anyone knows otherwise, I'll flag this page up as needing a rewrite in a few days time. WikianJim 15:06, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. The content seems more like a promo for the company's products than a factual article. There are some very dodgy statements in this piece, particularly with reference to the original 104, coupled cavity and conjugate loading. No mention of Laurie Fincham. And the company's bankruptcy is glossed over. (Why exactly did they go bust?)

I see that as of the 14th March 09 the whole page is now replaced with a copyright warning. I work for KEF and so can most likely get a version of the text in question released under a GFDL if required. I completely appreciate that the text in question is from our web site and is not be entirely appropriate for wikipedia, I have also refrained from starting a new version myself because of NPOV problems. The history that we publish on the web site is factually accurate although it does go into more detail on some points and skims over some others (such as the change of ownership). If there is a neutral party willing to have a shot at rewriting this article I would be more than happy to help them out with facts and figures from KEF wherever possible. Jackocleebrown (talk) 17:24, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I don't see any sign that a GFDL release has been acquired, so I have replaced the text with a clean stub that can be expanded on by interested editors. Meanwhile, if you do choose to seek release of the website's text, you can read the procedure at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. Thank you for being mindful of COI concerns. :) --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 11:59, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]