Talk:Kind of Blue

Good articleKind of Blue has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 22, 2008Good article nomineeListed
February 5, 2012Good article reassessmentKept
On this day...Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on August 17, 2009, August 17, 2010, August 17, 2012, August 17, 2019, August 17, 2022, and August 17, 2023.
Current status: Good article

GA Reassessment

[edit]
This discussion is transcluded from Talk:Kind of Blue/GA3. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.

The "Release history" has been tagged as needing more references since February 2010. I'm surprised no one has instigated a GAR yet. howcheng {chat} 17:40, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please tag If you place more specific {{cn}} tags on certain claims that you feel are unverified, it will be easy to resolve this. For now, this should help. —Justin (koavf)TCM18:24, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't apply the refimprove tag in the first place, but having an orange-level maintenance tag is incongruous with GA status. howcheng {chat} 21:10, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • I sourced several statements when I could find the information in the sources, and I removed one sentence and a list that I could not source. (This removal should not affect the article's completeness in any way.) I removed the {{refimprove}} tag as a result. I think this should clear up all issues. – Quadell (talk) 13:15, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Forgive a new commenter - The pitchfork rating for Kind of Blue as 6.6/10 is clearly directed as a review of the reissue not the actual album. This misleadingly presents the content of the review. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.176.64.36 (talk) 00:25, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]