Talk:L(R)

I added a dispute tag so that no one is accidentally misled by the page (as I briefly was). Statements that depend on large cardinal hypotheses cannot be described as "facts". The page should be rewritten to make clear which statements depend on large cardinal hypotheses, and which that don't. I would do it, but I'm not familiar enough with the material. -- Walt Pohl 15:41, 28 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I've added the dependency on large cardinals to the section header. Hopefully that should take care of it. --Trovatore 17:20, 28 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]