This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer graphics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computer graphics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer graphicsWikipedia:WikiProject Computer graphicsTemplate:WikiProject Computer graphicscomputer graphics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles
I'd like to see whoever complained about the promotional nature of the article to please explain their point of view more fully. It seems to me that the article accurately describes a uniquely innovative software system that's entirely free and open source; who is thought to benefit from "advertising" it?
It's been a week since I posted the above inquiry. No response here from user 'Anniepoo' who I believe added the 'newsrelease' tag inappropriately more than a month ago. I am removing the tag because as far as I can tell, the article is entirely factually accurate about a uniquely innovative software system, which is still under development. The unique and unprecedented functionality of this system makes it appropriate to discuss in an encyclopedic reference that includes articles about software. Also, as far as I can tell, there is no reported controversy or detraction about this system. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.233.51.56 (talk) 12:49, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]