Talk:Perry the Platypus/GA1
GA
review
(see
here
for criteria)
It is
reasonably well written
.
I fixed a few spelling errors
RJFJR
(
talk
)
16:46, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
[
reply
]
It is
factually accurate
and
verifiable
.
It has extensive references
It is
broad in its coverage
.
Seems sufficiently complete without excessive digression
It follows the
neutral point of view
policy
.
Looks OK on NPOV to me.
It is
stable
.
Reasonable stable (most recent changes were by me fixing spelling
RJFJR
(
talk
)
16:46, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
)
[
reply
]
It is illustrated by
images
, where possible and appropriate.
4 images: 3 drawings have fair use reasons attached, last is a photo (at commons) with an 'own work' status.
Overall
:
Pass
RJFJR
(
talk
)
16:46, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
[
reply
]
Thanks for the review!
The Flash
{talk}
18:57, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
[
reply
]