Talk:Point-to-point transit

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Aviation This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: | b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> | b2<!--Coverage and accuracy   --> = <yes/no> | b3<!--Structure               --> = <yes/no> | b4<!--Grammar and style       --> = <yes/no> | b5<!--Supporting materials    --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

This article only represents a very USA-centric view. The information presented is not true in much of the world. It should really be cleaned up or a disclaimer inserted. 88.97.240.113 (talk) 12:00, 9 June 2008 (UTC) J Warren[reply]

I agree. Ryanair and many other low-cost carriers in Europe operate similar systems and should be represented. Si Trew (talk) 15:12, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Even though Ryanair and easyJet are now mentioned, I think the article is still very USA-centric. And the final statement, starting "However is doubtful that there is any pure point-to-point airline... ", is unsubstantiated and, frankly, wrong - indeed the majority of flights in Europe are pure point-to-point journeys. The article needs a complete revamp, with relevant sources. Anyone up for it? Carbonix (talk) 14:32, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]