Talk:Rabbot

	Rabbot was a Media and drama good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones Date Process Result June 14, 2010 Articles for deletion No consensus September 9, 2010 Articles for deletion Kept March 2, 2011 Good article nominee Not listed March 26, 2011 Good article nominee Not listed December 7, 2011 Good article nominee Not listed Current status: Former good article nominee

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Cartoon Network Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cartoon Network, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to Cartoon Network on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Cartoon NetworkWikipedia:WikiProject Cartoon NetworkTemplate:WikiProject Cartoon NetworkCartoon Network articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Television: Episode coverage Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force (assessed as Low-importance). Animation: American Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the American animation work group (assessed as Low-importance).

This review is transcluded from Talk:Rabbot/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Matthew RD 19:40, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but I'm going to have to quick-fail this article for GA, due to point 2 in the GA criteria; it is not Facutally accurate and verifiable, the production section is largely unsourced. Feel free to renominate it after this issue has been addressed. Thank you. -- Matthew RD 19:40, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Rabbot/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Miyagawa (talk) 20:37, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Going to review shortly. Miyagawa (talk) 20:37, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Lead: No issues.
• Plot: No issues.

Something I noticed immediately with the references once I got to the Production section is that some references are placed inside the end of sentence punctuation, and some outside. Personally I think that they should be placed following the punctuation points - you just need to pick one way of doing it and make sure all the references are the same.

It is also expected that all questionable points should be cited, with a minimum of a cite at the end of a paragraph - additionally any quotes need to have a citation directly following them.

• Production: Paragraphs 1, 2 and 4 need citations at the end to cover everything. Paragraph 3 needs a full stop at the end. "This episode does not feature any guest appearances." needs to be merged into another paragraph as its too short to be on its own. "didn't want to air a show about food just going around and doing random stuff" needs a citation directly following it.

• Stealth pilot: Only the first sentence is cited.

• Reception: Needs more reviews to be included in order to provide balance.

• Home release: There's some uncited lines here too.

• References: All references need to be formatted the same, including data formats. boards.adultswim.com isn't a reliable source.

Given the issues remaining on this article, I'm afraid I'm going to give it another quick fail. Once you've worked through the list above and expanded the Reception section, feel free to resubmit. Miyagawa (talk) 20:52, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]