This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands articles
There seems to be a lot of editing on this page that is done by someone close to Roel. A lot of claims that are basically claiming that it is misunderstood etc. I am highly of the opinion that this page needs to be locked for users that are not registered as its obvious someone is trying to hide the many controversies surrounding this man. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.127.176.226 (talk) 13:34, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, same impression. I just reverted an edit by user "roelpieper" that claimed an article about the Sloot's coding system was "erroneous" because it was referring to it as compression technique. However the article even discusses Pieper's public criticism of this fact[1]. The motivation for discrediting the article could be the author's critical view on Roel Pieper's judgement on Sloot's credibility. --91.65.251.32 (talk) 01:05, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
