Santos Passos Church is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. For older candidates, please check the archive.
This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Portugal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Portugal on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PortugalWikipedia:WikiProject PortugalTemplate:WikiProject PortugalPortugal articles
Find correct name
The airport is not listed as João Paulo II anywhere.
The airport's own website calls itself simply Ponta Delgada, and has no mention of João Paulo.
Template:Regions of Portugal: statistical (NUTS3) subregions and intercommunal entities are confused; they are not the same in all regions, and should be sublisted separately in each region: intermunicipal entities are sometimes larger and split by subregions (e.g. the Metropolitan Area of Lisbon has two subregions), some intercommunal entities are containing only parts of subregions. All subregions should be listed explicitly and not assume they are only intermunicipal entities (which accessorily are not statistic subdivisions but real administrative entities, so they should be listed below, probably using a smaller font: we can safely eliminate the subgrouping by type of intermunicipal entity from this box).
Santos Passos Church is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
@V.B.Speranza sorry to keep giving you more work, but there are still issues with the article. As Ganesha811 mentioned, https://bloguedominho.blogs.sapo.pt/701396.html is a user-published blog and is not a reliable source; it must be removed. The "Pimentel" source lacks an author and title name; just replace it with the website that that URL links to as your source. The new lead paragraph contains facts that are not sourced anywhere in the rest of the article ("Gualterianas" and "colorful lights" do not appear in the rest of the article). These either need to be removed from the lead or mentioned elsewhere in the article with a proper source. This paragraph also needs to be copyedited once that is done, as there are multiple noticeable orthographic errors. Please let me know when you implement these suggestions. Thank you. Kimikel (talk) 00:51, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! I'm going to join here as an experienced reviewer and mentor per the backlog drive guide; either of you, please feel free to ask me any questions you may have.
Looking over the review, @Kimikel, you've done a great job covering prose and formatting. I only have two comments; first of all, the lead seems a bit short for the article - it's just a single sentence at the moment, so I would recommend expanding it. Secondly, one of the key parts of any GA review is the source review, to make sure that they are reliable, being accurately cited, and formatted correctly. I don't see any major causes for concern among the sources, but there are some minor things that need fixed (such as Pimentel 1989 missing a title and full author name, or a blog bloguedominho being used that may not be reliable). I recommend doing a pass over the citations to catch issues like these. Overall, it's a very thorough review so far! Nice work. —Ganesha811 (talk) 13:27, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Ganesha811: Considering the fact that @V.B.Speranza had incorporated the vast majority of our suggestions, I decided to be bold (as encouraged by the GAN review instructions) and make what I thought were the final edits needed for this to meet GA criteria. As such, I think it now passes a GA review. I would appreciate your appraisal our both of our work at this point; thank you in advance! Kimikel (talk) 03:28, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I made a couple of very minor changes. There are a few more tweaks and improvements I would suggest - adding more ISBNs to books and publications where available, adding translations of the Portuguese article/chapter/book titles to the references (there is a field for this), adding further archive links to references using IABot, adding more publishers to sources, etc, but I don't see anything major areas in need or big problems. I'd say that if you are satisfied, Kimikel, you should feel confident in passing this for GA! —Ganesha811 (talk) 18:00, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
"rectangular chancel" should be "a rectangular chancel"
first paragraph is a run on with too many "ands," break up with some punctuation
replace directions with fully-written words [SE->southeast], and remove wikilinks
"The volumes are..." the volumes of what? this sentence is kind of hard to follow
"The curves end up having little impact on the internal spatiality" is unnecessarily flowery and can be written more plainly
It is described as being a church with “a nave with concave curves at the corners and a slight convex curve on the façade” and “serious, simple and plain ornaments”. this seems unnecessary, considering this whole paragraph is dedicated to describing the church. remove or expand
"Originally there was a total of seven different Oratories, however, due to the growth of the city, some had to be moved or outright destroyed." would read better as "Originally, there was a total of seven different oratories; however, due to the growth of the city, some had to be moved or outright destroyed." This also needs additional clarification: how would the expansion of the city necessitate the destruction of some oratories?
Nowadays five Oratories remain," > "Nowadays, five oratories remain:"
one in the Santa Maria Street > one on Santa Maria Street
"the frontispiece's construction never began, but nevertheless" > the frontispiece's construction never began; nevertheless,
"and the customary worship" > and customary worship
"Oratories were constructed across the city by the Irmandade, but only"> "oratories were constructed across the city by the Irmandade; only"
last two paragraphs should be merged into one
article switches back and forth between full name and just Irmandade, stick to one
"incomplete chapel, so they decided to build a wall to close it off in 1767." > "incomplete chapel; in 1767, a wall was constructed to close it off.
"The chapel didn’t stay abandoned for long, as the Irmandade decided that they would either do a complete reconstruction of the building or just start all over and begin the construction of a completely new structure." > "The chapel did not remain abandoned for a long period of time, however; the Irmandade soon planned either the reconstruction of the building or the construction of a completely new structure."
separate the Galician Pedro... into new sentence, doesn't fit with first sentence. also what do you mean by "construction works"?
"was made by the renowned architect"> was designed by architect. Also source there does not mention Soares' work on this church, new source is needed.
"respected the architect's project": "project" seems like the wrong word there. maybe "plan" or "vision?"
"On the Count of Vila Pouca Theatre, also at the Campo da Feira,"> AT the Count of Vila Pouca Theatre, also located in the Campo da Feira,
"that the money raised could be used in aiding the construction efforts of the church"> that money could be raised to aid the construction efforts of the church
"On 18 October 1785 the body of the church was finished and it was blessed that same year."> On 18 October 1785, the body of the church was finished; it was blessed the same year.
"Construction of the apse only started in 1789"> Construction of the apse did not begin until 1789
"with Soares being in charge of the whole project in" > with Soares in charge of the entire project on
"Carvalho getting control" > Carvalho gaining control
"have significantly changed across" > have changed significantly throughout
"the church itself remains a testament of times long gone. It is easier for religious buildings to withstand the test of time compared to others, but thanks" delete all of this
"to years of conservation efforts and restoration works, the building" > but due to years of conservation efforts and restoration works, the church
Review finished. Please review my suggestions, putting on 7 day hold - Kimikel (talk) 02:51, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
(see below suggestions)
