Talk:Technopaganism

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Neopaganism Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Neopaganism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neopaganism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeopaganismWikipedia:WikiProject NeopaganismTemplate:WikiProject NeopaganismNeopaganism articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Religion: New religious movements Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by New religious movements work group (assessed as High-importance).

I've expanded this entry a bit. I'd love to see more data and actual citations. Blade 16:38, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Does anyone believe this outside the fictional world of white wolf games? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.105.227.234 (talk) 23:15, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. However, I do not believe you exist. So I guess we are even. Blade (talk) 02:23, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wait, what? If someone who doesn't exist types something, does he not exist? Honestly... However, you must see that what he means by asking that question is that he thinks it sounds so (exuse me for not bothering to find a maybe less insulting word) odd, that he wonders how anyone could believe this. Of course someone believes this, if it has it's own article on wikipedia and a own SIG, somebody must believe this, since (exucuse me once again) wasting so much time on something you don't believe in would be utterly worthless. 81.235.40.42 (talk) 17:53, 20 November 2008 (UTC)Yet another unsigned user from the depths of the internet[reply]

I think I can elaborate a little on this as a "neopagan". General speaking, the whole concept of "cities as spirits" isn't an unknown concept, and I do indeed know a person who practices some of the stuff in Penczak's(sp) "City Magic" work. Personally speaking, I can see the idea of the Internet attaining spiritual significance as a valid one and one that has merit if you think about how prevelent the Internet really is to everday life to a lot of people.TheStormofWar (talk) 22:25, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]