Talk:Tephrosia apollinea

Tephrosia apollinea has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: April 4, 2014. (Reviewed version).

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Plants Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Tephrosia apollinea/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 16:12, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take this as requested. Be prepared for the world's fastest GA review!! ☠ Jaguar ☠ 16:12, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   It is well referenced.

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

• Just to clear something up (this is not an issue with the article itself): "found in the Middle East in areas such as Egypt and Sudan, Yemen, Oman and the United Arab Emirates" - the Middle East is a region or area, but Egypt, Sudan, Yemen and so on are countries?
• The lead complies per WP:LEAD and the GA criteria. The above question isn't really a concern!

Honestly I see no problems here. The prose is excellent and there are no points to make - references are in the correct places so this section meets the GA criteria.

Again - nothing. Every reference is correct and well placed. Prose is excellent and is GA-standard.

You know, for a plant it is as comprehensive as it can possibly be. I'm very impressed by the number of reference this has for such a small article, and because it is such a small article there are no copyediting issues at all (something which I only focus on). I'll promote this immaterially. Tephrosia apollinea has made history as one of the shortest Good Articles out there (and probably not to mention one of the shortest GARs)! Well done on all the work! ☠ Jaguar ☠ 16:22, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]