This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
IMO Capitalist Piglet should have its own article.
-it does now: Capitalist Piglet, should we add a reference to the main Sheaf entry about it? Akiracee (talk) 21:36, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
Then add a page. Someone keeps deleting this entry and I have no idea what to do.
None of this stuff has any citations. It's a very detailed article, and there are no links to other sources verifying its veracity. (I realize that most everything stated here is true, but this is still the way Wiki works). And perhaps there is too much focus on the Capitalist Piglet scandal. --Aylwinatrix Dec 27, 06
Yeah, I agree. In the meantime, I edited the Capitalist Piglet article. I snipped out the bits about supposed Christian hypocrisy re: Muslim cartoons. Real or not, Wikipedia is not the place for this. I snipped out a couple of other violations of NPOV. --Smo December 28, 06