Talk:William Sudell

	William Sudell has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones Date Process Result March 12, 2009 Peer review Reviewed May 23, 2009 Good article nominee Listed
	A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on February 19, 2009. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that William Sudell coined the name "Football League"?
Current status: Good article

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Sports and Games This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the sports and games work group (assessed as Low-importance). Football: England Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the English football task force (assessed as Low-importance). Lancashire and Cumbria Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lancashire and Cumbria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lancashire and Cumbria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Lancashire and CumbriaWikipedia:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaTemplate:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaLancashire and Cumbria articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

This review is transcluded from Talk:William Sudell/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

I shall be reviewing this article. Jezhotwells (talk) 23:47, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quick fail criteria assessment

1. The article completely lacks reliable sources – see Wikipedia:Verifiability.

   • Adequately sourced

2. The topic is treated in an obviously non-neutral way – see Wikipedia:Neutral point of view.

   • WP:NPOV

3. There are cleanup banners that are obviously still valid, including cleanup, wikify, NPOV, unreferenced or large numbers of fact, clarifyme, or similar tags.

   • no cleanup banners

4. The article is or has been the subject of ongoing or recent, unresolved edit wars.

   • no edit warring

5. The article specifically concerns a rapidly unfolding current event with a definite endpoint.

   • n/a

No problems with quickfail crieria, proceeding to substantive review. Jezhotwells (talk) 23:52, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose):

   • The article is reasonably well written, I made a few a copy-edits. Jezhotwells (talk) 00:01, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

   b (MoS):

   • The article conforms with the WP:MOS Jezhotwells (talk) 00:01, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references):

   • References support the facts as far as it is possible to ascertain. I assume WP:AGF for print sources. Jezhotwells (talk) 00:10, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

   b (citations to reliable sources):

   • All sources conform with WP:RS Jezhotwells (talk) 00:10, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

   c (OR):

   • I find no evidence of WP:OR Jezhotwells (talk) 00:10, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

3. It is broad in its scope.

   a (major aspects):

   • The article is broad in its scope ....

   b (focused):

   • .... and remains focussed throughout. Jezhotwells (talk) 00:13, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   • Complies with WP:NPOV Jezhotwells (talk) 00:15, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

   • No evidence of edit wars. Jezhotwells (talk) 00:15, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):

   • One public domain image is used, correctly tagged. Jezhotwells (talk) 00:16, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   • A suitable caption is used for the image Jezhotwells (talk) 00:21, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   • I am happy to pas this as a Good article. Congratulations. Jezhotwells (talk) 00:21, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]