- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Bruxton (talk) 20:35, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
801 Grand
Improved to Good Article status by Etriusus (talk). Self-nominated at 14:04, 15 January 2023 (UTC).
- Starting review. Ktin (talk) 17:52, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
| General: Article is new enough and long enough
|
|
|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
|
|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
|
|
|
Overall: 
Article meets eligibility criteria. Recently promoted to GA status. No issues with article's tone etc. Article is adequately sourced. The hook is interesting. The hook's source refers to an archive from 2004 (did I get that right?) Can we get a more recent link? Did a couple of Google searches and it seems to check-out, but, will be good to get a more recent RS link here. No issues detected by Earwig. QPQ done. Passing this back to the nominator. Almost there. Nice work with the article. Ktin (talk) 18:01, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- @Ktin:, I replaced it with an updated source from the Iowa Architectural Foundation. I didn't realize that the Emporis archive was so old, unfortunately it can't be updated since Emporis went offline earlier last year. I appreciate the compliment. :) 🏵️Etrius ( Us) 18:28, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- Marking approved. Good to go. Ktin (talk) 18:32, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- DYK bot did not register the green tick above, so I am posting it here again per the above review. Z1720 (talk) 18:02, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
Article meets eligibility criteria. Recently promoted to GA status. No issues with article's tone etc. Article is adequately sourced. The hook is interesting. The hook's source refers to an archive from 2004 (did I get that right?) Can we get a more recent link? Did a couple of Google searches and it seems to check-out, but, will be good to get a more recent RS link here. No issues detected by Earwig. QPQ done. Passing this back to the nominator. Almost there. Nice work with the article. Ktin (talk) 18:01, 15 January 2023 (UTC)