- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 16:42, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Bare-headed laughingthrush
- ... that some of the calls of the bare-headed laughingthrush have been described as "comical"? Source: [1]
5x expanded by AryKun (talk). Self-nominated at 13:45, 2 March 2022 (UTC).
: New enough (5x started on March 2, 2022) and long enough (6,021 characters). AGF on source. Article is sufficiently cited, and in neutral. Hook in interesting, is in the article, neutral, cited, within 200 character limit. QPQ done. "Good to go". – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 08:35, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
- @AryKun: going out on a limb here, but I think a hook actually describing the calls the way you do in the article would be hysterical. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 20:49, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
References
- ^ Collar, Nigel; Robson, Craig (2021-08-18). Billerman, Shawn M.; Keeney, Brooke K.; Rodewald, Paul G.; Schulenberg, Thomas S. (eds.). "Bare-headed Laughingthrush (Melanocichla calva)". Birds of the World. Cornell Lab of Ornithology. doi:10.2173/bow.bahlau1.01.1. Retrieved 2022-03-02.