The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cielquiparle (talk) 20:22, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
Overall: @Edwardx: Nominated a little late but I'm fine with that – long enough, although just barely, neutral and sourced. Doesn't appear to be a copyvio and the pic is nice and meets the criteria. QPQ done. The only issue is that the hook needs to be sourced in the article (the sentence His wife wrote in her diary "It is a most attractive house but rather small." and that she had written to Paul Edward Paget and his partner John Seely (later John Seely, 2nd Baron Mottistone) about adding to it needs a reference) – and could you show me which source says that? Thanks. BeanieFan11 (talk) 23:54, 24 February 2023 (UTC) BeanieFan11 (talk) 23:54, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Thank you, BeanieFan11. If you search Google Books for "Brightwell Manor most attractive house but rather small" it will come up. It is on p236 of Adam Fox's 1960 book about Inge. But, I'm struggling to add the ref correctly to the article itself, such that you can click through to it from there. Edwardx (talk) 00:03, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
I see now. Also, I've added the ref for that sentence, as the DYK rules require, so now it appears to be good to go! BeanieFan11 (talk) 00:06, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
It doesn't seem like google books gives many people access to that book, only through the snipping view. So I don't think there's a way you could add it allowing people to read it. BeanieFan11 (talk) 00:09, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
BeanieFan11, it only gives me a snipping view too, but it is enough to show the salient fact in support of the hook. Edwardx (talk) 00:16, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
I gave the hook a tweak. Philafrenzy (talk) 17:37, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
The original hook is making a small joke that only works in the top spot, but really the content of the hook isn't weighty enough to support that position. We should also attribute the words properly to the author, Mary Inge, or be accused of sexism. What about:
ALT1 ... that Brightwell Manor(pictured) was the home of a eugenicist clergyman who did not believe in democracy? Article would need expanding in this respect.
Needs reviewer for new ALT hooks. (Unless BeanieFan11 doesn't mind having another look?) Cielquiparle (talk) 12:15, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
@Philafrenzy and Edwardx: I'm fine with those hooks but does the article need expanding for them like Phila mentioned? Onegreatjoke (talk) 14:56, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
I have added a sentence and reference to confirm that Inge was a eugenicist and did not believe in democracy - well attested elsewhere too. As for women's rights, it seems that was just a general opposition to extending democratic rights further so I deleted that as not explicitly supported in the source. Philafrenzy (talk) 21:11, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
@Philafrenzy, Edwardx, and Onegreatjoke: Striking ALT2, which is not ok. Source cited is The Guardian which says, Boris Johnson is understood to have agreed to buy a £4m nine-bedroom, Grade II-listed home in Oxfordshire...The Guardian has been told they have now made an offer that has been accepted...A spokesperson for Johnson said: "We never comment on matters such as living arrangements." Even if it has been published by The Guardian, it is still a "word of mouth" claim about a living person and a real estate transaction that could technically still be in progress (it doesn't say that the sale has closed). As such, it violates some combination of WP:GOSSIP and WP:RUMOUR / WP:CRYSTALBALL, and is WP:TOOSOON to cite on the main page. If you don't like ALT1, we can strike that one as well. So far, no one is jumping up and down about ALT0, so maybe we just need a new hook. I suspect there is something more of substance that could be added to the article, which might yield an interesting hook. Cielquiparle (talk) 10:54, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
Well just go with Alt1 then. Philafrenzy (talk) 12:04, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
@Edwardx: Nominated a little late but I'm fine with that – long enough, although just barely, neutral and sourced. Doesn't appear to be a copyvio and the pic is nice and meets the criteria. QPQ done. The only issue is that the hook needs to be sourced in the article (the sentence 
BeanieFan11 (talk) 00:06, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Needs reviewer for new ALT hooks. (Unless BeanieFan11 doesn't mind having another look?) Cielquiparle (talk) 12:15, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
