- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 talk 22:54, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Council Working Party
- ... that while Council Working Parties formally only prepare decisions by the Council of the European Union, they de facto shape the majority of those decisions? Source: Häge 2016, p. 686 "Formally, working parties only ‘prepare’ the ministers’ work, but de facto, they make the majority of Council decisions."
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Tamurbek Dawletschin
(claimed, not done)(done)
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Tamurbek Dawletschin
Created by WatkynBassett (talk) on 5 August 2024.
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 25 past nominations.
WatkynBassett (talk) 07:47, 11 August 2024 (UTC).
| General: Article is new enough and long enough |
|---|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
|---|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
|---|
|
| QPQ: Done. |
Overall: 
Munfarid1 (talk) 11:54, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Hi, @WatkynBassett: Even if your hook is ok, I think a second one, shorter and more interesting, could be based on Melzer's claim that democratic control of their work is difficult to achieve. - How about formulating an ALT1, so the user who will perpare this for DYK will have a choice? After all, we want people to be hooked to read the article, so a critical view of the working groups could be appropriate. Munfarid1 (talk) 16:47, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Munfarid1: Thank you for taking the time to review the article and your suggestion! I am, however, a bit sceptical whether building a hook from this critical view is wise. I think we would have to attribute this view to a specific person (as I have recently experienced while a different hook of mine was prepared in a queue) and I find hooks with specific attribution a bit clunky to read). WatkynBassett (talk) 05:29, 18 September 2024 (UTC)