Template:Did you know nominations/The Hooded Man

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by BorgQueen talk 02:08, 25 August 2024 (UTC)

The Hooded Man

The Hooded Man being tortured at Abu Ghraib prison by U.S military
The Hooded Man being tortured at Abu Ghraib prison by U.S military
Created by Mhhossein (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 63 past nominations.

Mhhossein talk 07:20, 24 July 2024 (UTC).


General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Pic is a little pixel-y but looks okay at this resolution. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 20:12, 24 July 2024 (UTC)

  • Mhhossein, there are significant WP:CLOP/WP:V issues with the Hansen 2015 source in the Reception section, and the Der Spiegel source in the "Similar torture cases" section. These paragraphs need rephrasing. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 16:09, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
AirshipJungleman29: Thanks for the note. They just slipped through my eyes. I think the issue is resolved now. --Mhhossein talk 07:13, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
What you have done is replace a few words with synonyms—in other words, there is no improvement in terms of WP:CLOP. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 09:19, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
@AirshipJungleman29: That should be fine now. --Mhhossein talk 06:34, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
@Hawkeye7: Thanks for your review. AirshipJungleman29 is not responding to my ping. Can you please re-evaluate the status of the article for DYK? --Mhhossein talk 13:00, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
Yes, I think it is just about acceptable now; it does not need re-evaluation, and is waiting to be promoted. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 13:28, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
Just got back from Poland. Earwig score of 20.6% looks fine. Good to go. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 04:32, 14 August 2024 (UTC)