- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 01:42, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
Venla Luukkonen
Improved to Good Article status by Lewolka (talk). Nominated by Onegreatjoke (talk) at 15:32, 18 October 2022 (UTC).
Reviewing... Howard the Duck (talk) 02:40, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
- I've withdrew my nomination that caused this QPQ review, so I won't be proceeding with reviewing this. Howard the Duck (talk) 12:35, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
- New reviewer needed. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 20:18, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
I will review this. jengod (talk) 23:02, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
Length
|
Newness
|
Cited hook
|
Interest
|
Sources
|
Neutrality
|
Plagiarism/paraphrase
|
✔
|
✔
|
✔
|
✔
|
✔
|
✔
|
✔
|
4000+ characters, promoted to good article within the time bound, hook fact source in Finnish is accepted in good faith, hook fact is interesting (good for her!), article is appropriately sourced and NPOV, no sign of plagiarism. QPQ is done. Ready to go. jengod (talk) 23:19, 9 November 2022 (UTC)