- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by reviewer, closed by BorgQueen (talk) 11:05, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
Women Today
Created by Mike Halterman (talk). Self-nominated at 15:57, 27 July 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Women Today; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
- Article was nominated within 7 days of creation. Article is more than 1,500 words in prose. QPQ is done. Both hooks seem interesting and good. Earwig showed a 62.1% detection, making copyright violation a possibility, but most of it comes from quotations. It is advised you limit them. Second paragraph under "Impact of Women Today" shows no citations. Some wording is not neutral, i.e. "Women Today was the brainchild of Clare Duignan" feels WP:FLOWERY and could be better reworded into something like "Women Today was conceived by Clare Duignan". Another example is how the lead states that Women Today is a "pioneering Irish radio programme" when the word "pioneering" affects the neutrality of the statement. lullabying (talk) 04:42, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
- Nominator hasn't edited since August 21 and did not respond to the above review. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 14:36, 6 September 2023 (UTC)