- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by BorgQueen talk 17:34, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
superseded combination
- ... that a superseded combination is not the same as a synonym and technically should not be called one?
- Source: Tammy HORTON; Serge GOFAS; Andreas KROH; Gary C.B. POORE; Geoffrey READ; Gary ROSENBERG; Sabine STÖHR; Nicolas BAILLY; Nicole BOURY-ESNAULT; Simone N. BRANDÃO; Mark J. COSTELLO; Wim DECOCK; Stefanie DEKEYZER; Francisco HERNANDEZ; Jan MEES; Gustav PAULAY; Leen VANDEPITTE; Bart VANHOORNE; Sofie VRANKEN (2017). "Improving nomenclatural consistency: a decade of experience in the World Register of Marine Species" (PDF). European Journal of Taxonomy (389): 1-24. doi:10.5852/ejt.2017.389. ISSN 2118-9773. OCLC 8538908866. Archived (PDF) from the original on 19 April 2024. Retrieved 8 July 2024.
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Libotonius
- Comment: I welcome alternate hook suggestions.
awkwafaba (📥) 18:44, 9 July 2024 (UTC).
- Too easy! ALT1: ... that a superseded combination is not a synonym for a synonym? :P theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 22:02, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
New enough (July 8), long enough (1600 B), well-sourced, copyvio-free. Hook fact verified in source. I would go with ALT1, as long as Awkwafaba likes it. — Vigilant Cosmic Penguin 🐧 (talk | contribs) 04:59, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
