This template creates a row in a source assessment table, corresponding to a single source being assessed with respect to Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies). It is meant for use in deletion discussions. It must be enclosed in template {{ORGCRIT assess table}}.
The use of this template does not imply a final or consensus view of how any given source should be assessed. Though it may be used to summarize a developing consensus, it may also reflect the assessments of a single editor in the course of a discussion.
Background
[edit]The ORGCRIT is a benchmark for assessing the presumed notability of organizations. From ORGCRIT: "A company, corporation, organization, group, product, or service is notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject." ORGCRIT and other guidelines expand on what is meant by "significant coverage", "reliability", and "independence".
This template (with {{ORGCRIT assess table}}) provides a visually clear means of presenting as assessment of sources against each of these four criteria, as well as an overall assessment derived from these criterion assessments.
Usage
[edit]{{ ORGCRIT assess
| source = <!-- Source (link or citation template) -->
| ind = <!-- y/n/-/? -->
| ind_just = <!-- Justification re: independence -->
| rel = <!-- y/n/-/? -->
| rel_just = <!-- Justification re: reliability -->
| sig = <!-- y/n/-/? -->
| sig_just = <!-- Justification re: significance of coverage -->
| sec = <!-- y/n/-/? -->
| sec_just = <!-- Justification re: secondary source -->
}}
Abbreviated:
{{ORGCRIT assess
| src =
| i = | ij =
| r = | rj =
| s = | sj =
| 2 = | 2j =
}}
| Argument | Purpose | Notes | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| source or src | The source being assessed | Should contain, at the very least, a link to the source being assessed; it may contain any other useful information, including {{citation}} templates. | ||||||||||||||||||
| ind or i (independence) | Discrete assessment of whether the source meets the criterion |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| rel or r (reliability) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| sig or s (significance of coverage) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| sec or 2 (secondary source) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| ind_just or ij | Justification for the corresponding assessment | These arguments are not strictly required, but their use is highly encouraged; deletion discussions are evaluated on the basis of well-supported arguments based on policy and guidelines. | ||||||||||||||||||
| rel_just or rj | ||||||||||||||||||||
| sig_just or sj | ||||||||||||||||||||
| sec_just or 2j |
"Overall" assessment
[edit]The template computes an overall summary assessment of the source, based on the three criteria. This overall assessment is determined as follows:
| If... | Overall assessment | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| All four criteria are "yes" |  |
The source supports the case that the article meets ORGCRIT |
| One or more criteria are "–" and all the rest are "yes" | – | The source partially supports the case that the article meets ORGCRIT |
| Any of the criteria are "no" |  |
The source does not support the case that the article meets ORGCRIT |
| Any of the criteria are "?" or blank, but none are "no" | .svg){kind=small} |
The value of the source with respect to ORGCRIT has not been or cannot be determined |
See also
[edit]- {{source assess}} / {{source assess table}} – similar templates for assessing against the general notability guideline