Top-four primary

A joint Politics and Economics series
Social choice and electoral systems
Single-winner methods
Single vote - plurality methods

Condorcet methods

Positional voting

Cardinal voting

Proportional representation
Party-list

Quota-remainder methods

Approval-based committees

Fractional social choice

Semi-proportional representation

Mixed systems
By results of combination
By mechanism of combination

By ballot type

Paradoxes and pathologies
Spoiler effects

Pathological response

Strategic voting

Paradoxes of majority rule

Social and collective choice
Impossibility theorems

Positive results

icon Mathematics portal

A final-four or final-five primary is an electoral system using a nonpartisan primary by multi-winner plurality in the first step.[1][2]

The Final-Four Voting system was first proposed by businessmen Katherine Gehl and Michael Porter in a 2017 report entitled "Why Competition in the Politics Industry is Failing America".[3] It was first advocated by FairVote in 2012.[4][5] FairVote proposed a statutory model in 2015.[6]

It was first used in the 2022 Alaska special election. In the first round of the general election, Republican votes were split between first-rank preferences for Palin and Peltola, creating a spoiler effect known as a center squeeze.[7][8][9] Begich was eliminated first (although he had received a higher number of votes in the blanket primary than either of the remaining two candidates.)[10][11][12][13] In the final runoff, Begich voters transferred their choices to Palin and Peltola, and Peltola won. Despite Begich's greater overall popularity, Palin's second-choice votes were not allowed to transfer to Begich (which would have allowed Begich to win the election).

A top-four primary can be seen as a variation of a two-round system, in which the second round (general election) is always held, even if a candidate gains a majority in the first (primary) round. A candidate receiving 20% of the primary vote is logically guaranteed to pass a top-four primary.[14] One variation, called Final Five Voting, allows five candidates to pass the open primary.[15]

  1. ^ Cite error: The named reference afbe was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  2. ^ "Missouri Top-Four Ranked Choice Voting Elections for Local, State, and Federal Officials Initiative (2022)".
  3. ^ Gehl & Porter (September 2017). "Why Competition In The Politics Industry Is Failing America" (PDF). Harvard Business School. Retrieved May 7, 2024.
  4. ^ Fixing Top Two in California The 2012 Elections and a Prescription for Further Reform
  5. ^ Top Four FairVote August 2013
  6. ^ "FAIRVOTE'S 2015 POLICY GUIDE: MODEL STATUTORY LANGUAGE".
  7. ^ Cite error: The named reference :0 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  8. ^ Cite error: The named reference :1 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  9. ^ Cite error: The named reference :2 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  10. ^ Cite error: The named reference :3 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  11. ^ Cite error: The named reference :4 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  12. ^ Cite error: The named reference :5 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  13. ^ Cite error: The named reference :6 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  14. ^ Top Four Why Top Four Gives More Voice to Voters (FairVote)
  15. ^ "Final-Five Voting".