Twining v. New Jersey | |
---|---|
Argued March 19–20, 1908 Decided November 9, 1908 | |
Full case name | Albert C. Twining and David C. Cornell, plaintiffs in error v. State of New Jersey |
Citations | 211 U.S. 78 (more) 29 S. Ct. 14, 53 L. Ed. 97, 1908 U.S. LEXIS 1528 |
Holding | |
Fifth Amendment rights against self-incrimination apply only to federal, not state, court cases. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Moody, joined by Fuller, Brewer, White, Peckham, McKenna, Holmes, Day |
Dissent | Harlan |
Overruled by | |
Malloy v. Hogan, 378 U.S. 1 (1964) |
Twining v. New Jersey, 211 U.S. 78 (1908), was a case of the U.S. Supreme Court. In this case, the Court established the Incorporation Doctrine by concluding that while certain rights enumerated in the Bill of Rights might apply to the states under the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause, the Fifth Amendment's right against self-incrimination is not incorporated.
The Twining decision was overturned by the decision in Malloy v. Hogan in 1964, in which the Court incorporated the right against self-incrimination.