My standards for supporting a Request for adminship
- Trustworthiness, demonstrated by commitment to Wikipedia: a reasonable mainspace edit count and time with project (perhaps 1000 edits and 3 months)
- Policy knowledge: edits that demonstrate a basic knowledge of policy; can be to mainspace, talk pages, or Wikipedia space
- Understanding of administrator duties and desire to be an administrator: good answer to question 1
- Edit summary use (a pet peeve, perhaps): >95% for major edits
- Civility and maturity: your actions will reflect on Wikipedia
I disagree that adminship is no big deal. Administrators are given special trust, and their say carries extra weight. An administrator should therefore be expected to represent the community well.
Λυδαcιτγ 23:16, 9 April 2007 (UTC)