I have removed the {{prod}} tag from Freesexuality, which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the {{prod}} template back to the article. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! LoveArtist (talk) 21:21, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
Re David Ferguson (impresario)
We apologize if you feel we are "hectoring" you. We understand it is of little interest to you, but we are the victims of untruths on this page. We understand that Wikipedia is comprised of volunteers. We appreciate the good work you all do. We made a point of never making any personal attack on you, while our lives are being distorted by disreputable assertions on Mr. Ferguson's page.
We are quite versed in American Law. We are asking you what we need to do to refute the false assertions on this page. We have no personal agenda other than the right to provide the truth, and nothing but the truth.
We merely want to know what is the acceptable procedure to state verifiable statements which refute what Ferguson and his writers have presented as fact. We are not moving forward because we do not want our IP blocked.
We are asking for help and all we are told is to read the rules (which we read before posting what you removed). We are asking how to proceed other than being relegated to side pages while Mr. Ferguson's page stands as truth. It can can be readily proven to perpetuate myths about hard-working people whose history, work and LIVES he has damaged.
Thank you for your consideration in this matter. ALSO, we are not the first ones to object to the comments. We think that is a big red warning sign that Mr. Ferguson has a pattern of not presenting the truth. We are not in any way associated with anyone else who has made comments, on his page or the side pages.
Have a good day and we mean that! Thank you again, in advance, for your help.
Re David Ferguson (impresario) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Damesmartypants (talk • contribs) 08:06, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
The page uses Ferguson's own interviews to verify his info! Isn't that in violation of your policies?
You are denying others the right refute this page's numerous distortions and exaggerations. If links to published books (not self-published), reputable websites, and footnotes provided, will that be enough? May I post scans of legal judgments and government documents to verify statements?
You allow Ferguson's statements, conclusions, assertions and inferences to remain without citations. How can you justify that while removing our detailed refutations?
You claim we are violating his rights, but what about our rights? He distorts our history, lives and work and misquotes our books, magazines, interviews and other sources, but you delete our input? It's OUR living biographies and accomplishments which he is distorting.
Much of what is stated on this page is refuted by many third parties PRIOR to this page being posted. Yet his version stands and our comments removed?
For example, he claims management of certain rock groups, whereas various books, documentaries, interviews and sites all state someone else managed that group during the time frame and events he claims as his work. Or that he managed a group, but during a different time frame than he states. There's no verification on his end, and when we posted accurate but different dates, you removed our info?
Doesn't your removal of our information violate Wikipedia's policies, when we provided far more specific info than the original writer?
You removed text which was very detailed as to specific events, persons, places, photos, books and websites available to verify the new notations. Although he did not sign his page, original input was provided by Ferguson to his writer(s). Much is lifted from ifuc.org and other sites supervised by Ferguson.
By allowing only his version to stand, you are perpetuating the errors purported by Ferguson, without verification from him. His minimal footnotes referring to books don't provide specific quotes nor give page numbers, thus not substantiating his text.
Everything we posted can be proven in a court of law. But we are artists and musicians, without the funds to take him to court.
—Preceding unsigned comment added by Damesmartypants (talk • contribs) 18:37, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
Hello, this Damesmartypants character seems to have gone overboard on the legal history section again. She is clearly using this as a WP:Soap and has some personal issue with Mr. Ferguson. You may want to check out her recent additions and comments on David Ferguson (impresario). Switchintoglide (talk) 17:30, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
Re vandalism
This IP has over 100 users associated with it. Please can you give us a clue as to what act of vandalism occurred and we will seek to resolve the situation. We see you reverted it but we don't know what it was that was reverted? 193.195.92.146 (talk) 14:44, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
Re: Re: vandalism
Thanks for letting us know. This certainly looks like someone messing around. We will investigate this further. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.195.92.146 (talk) 11:09, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
Matthew S. Thomas
This page is true. He is a great basketball player and is going to be a great basketball player in the NBA. Why would you propose this deletion?? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Baseballkid9836 (talk • contribs) 14:25, 6 November 2008 (UTC)