 | This is an essay. It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Wikipedia contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of Wikipedia's policies or guidelines, as it has not been thoroughly vetted by the community. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints. |
|
This user thinks that integrating Wikipedia is a waste of time. |
NOTE: This essay has evolved from snarky commentation to deeper thinking. Please do not go nitpicking through the history, but read what is presented. It cannot be read shorn of it's sarcastic tone, but there is thinking here.
| “ | I created two articles today, with sources. What the fuck did you do? Saved a list of masturbation positions for hermaphrodites. Out-fucking-standing. | ” |
| “ | Look, this band is notable to the people who listen to them. Go apply your stupid policys somwhere else, and stop stiflign creativity. | ” |
| “ | On Wikipedia, there is a giant conspiracy attempting to have articles agree with reality | ” |
Before you start : This kind of shit is why I hate inclusionist thinking
Terms you should be comfortable with :
- m:Immediatism - Concept that articles should be judged as they are NOW
- m:Exclusionism - Concept that articles that are included should be above standards
- m:Deletionism - Concept that articles that don't meet standards NOW should be deleted
- m:Inclusionism - Concept that anything goes, including original research and garage bands.
- The First Pillar : What WP is not - What Inclusionists ignore