User:Ikiroid/Desk

I'm a participant in the Cleanup Taskforce. Please add up to 5 open issues below by following the instructions at the Cleanup Taskforce page.

There is far too little information in this article about the Pāli language, and far too much about installing non-Pāli-specific fonts on Windows. --Marnen Laibow-Koser (talk) (desk) 22:10, 9 November 2005 (UTC)

• Moved to my desk. Draeco 06:47, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

I withdraw from the task, moved back to "Unassigned" - Draeco 02:58, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

Added to User:Ikiroid/Desk RJFJR 20:50, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

Update: I've standardised the resources as well as added IPA. There is still a lot of unnecessary information and not enough necessary information. The ikiroid (talk·desk·Advise me) 15:40, 6 April 2007 (UTC) This is a pretty good article, but it doesn't have any references. It has lots of external links though. If someone could add inline references (like this), it would improve the article a lot. – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 20:45, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

This article wrongly states that the word 'Algebra' was taken from English, when it is in fact the opposite.

Update: The references have been organized, and I added one. Awhile back I added some stuff about Arabic Grammar, and the article looks pretty good now. What else needs to be done? The ikiroid (talk·desk·Advise me) 22:42, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

I'm adding some comments on the talk page. --Cbdorsett 05:48, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

The first sentence of the last paragraph of the "History" section is confusing. Here's the original:

By the fourth century AD, the Arab kingdoms of the Lakhmids in southern Iraq, the Ghassanids in southern Syria the Kindite Kingdom emerged in Central Arabia.

And here's a proposed clarification:

By the fourth century AD, the Arab kingdoms of the Lakhmids in southern Iraq, the Ghassanids in southern Syria, and the Kindite Kingdom in Central Arabia (had?) emerged.

Would anyone object to this going in? It makes it grammatical, and while I'm unsure of the facts—thus the optional had—I don't think it's any worse than what's there now. --Pkahle 08:36, 26 September 2007 (UTC)