You might be reading this because I've voted on your RfA. If so thanks for being interested in my comments. Please note that if I am not supporting your RfA this does not necessarily mean I think you're a bad editor, just that you are not suitable to be an admin yet or I cannot tell if you would be a suitable admin (e.g. you might make a fantastic admin, just not have enough history for me to make an informed judgement).
Here are some of the things I think about when casting my opinion, and why I might oppose or support a RfA. I might support or oppose for another reason, specified at the specific RfA, or just from a general impression based on experience interacting with a user. These criteria will almost certainly change, develop, and/or be added to over time, and are therefore not set in stone rules that I will always stick to. I welcome any comments on these, please leave them on the talk page. I'm also happy to go into further detail as to why I came to a specific decision on a RfA, if you have any questions please ask on my main talk page. Thanks.
Note about 'vote': I realise RFA is not an election, I use the term vote for convenience to refer to when I cast an opinion on RFA that is in the form of support or oppose.