User talk:Factchecker atyourservice

well OK then!

User:Sandstein Factchecker_atyourservice violates their topic ban by making this request because it concerns a dispute that bears on US politics.

That is absurdly coy phrasing of my application requesting the striking of comments that 100% mischaracterized my conduct in a dispute from TEN YEARS AGO. Your comments make it sound like I am trying to further an actual dispute. But hey, it sure is disruptive to ask for false claims in an official forum to be stricken. Factchecker_atyourservice 15:57, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It is if you are banned from the topic area. Sandstein 16:59, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Sandstein: that's rich—if I go to ANI to get the AE record corrected after my topic ban expires, someone will say I'm trying to "dredge up old disputes" and I'll just be re-topic-banned. Factchecker_atyourservice 01:25, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quite possibly. Therefore I advise you to just ignore this matter. People say wrong things on the Internet and on Wikipedia all the time; it is not worth your and certainly not everybody else's time to try to dispute this issue. Sandstein 07:06, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Sandstein: Has your interpretation of WP:BANEX in this circumstance ever been commented on by the community? Because, I'd have disagreed and I'm wondering how loose intended that policy was meant to be.--v/r - TP 14:30, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Since this is the first time I've encountered this circumstance - no, not to my knowledge. Sandstein 15:19, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If these circumstances happen again, would you mind pinging me? I'd like to talk about it next time.--v/r - TP 15:50, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]