Here in Ontario we had a case where a woman applied for a library card for her young son, signing a form by which she agreed to accept responsibility for any fines he incurred. That card was stolen and used to borrow $160 (&320 English) worth of books that were never returned at all. She refused to pay for the booksand the library sued her for the money. The verdict was that she would have to pay the money, even though her son wasn't the actual book thief, because her son's name was on the stolen card and she'd agreed tdo so; her signature was on the card itself, and so she was held responsibility for the debt. This whole situation would've made for a perfect Fat Albert cartoon if production hadn't ceased at that time.Glammazon (talk) 18:13, 3 November 2019 (UTC)