User talk:Judgewang

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Judgewang (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I was blocked for being an "obvious sock/troll" but I am not. I believe a mistake has been made. Judgewang (talk) 17:02, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Seems pretty obvious to me. Yamla (talk) 17:14, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Judgewang (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

It's obvious? Run a check user. I'm not a sock. Judgewang (talk) 00:30, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I find this claim improbable, unless you have a very good explanation of how a genuine novice started their wiki career with requesting an undeletion for someone else's article. 01:56, 21 November 2017 (UTC)


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.