User talk:MacauMan888

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MacauMan888 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was wrongfully blocked by @Primefac: who claims my account is related to Editorofthepage1, however, I have no relation whatsoever to the aforementioned user. Furthermore Primefac negligently deleted Draft:Sabrina Ho for no reason whatsoever when it is currently part of a content dispute in mediation. Primefac incorrectly claims Draft:Sabrina Ho was created by a banned user Editorofthepage1 (who again is unrelated to me) when it was not.

Decline reason:

 Confirmed abuse of multiple accounts. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 12:53, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{{Checkuser needed}} Wait for the CU results. SA 13 Bro (talk) 12:47, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Even if the CU results don't turn out to be the same this user as Editorofthepage1 they could be the same as WikiWhat888. In the unlikely but possible event that they are neither they still committed copyright violations by doing copy and paste moves. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 12:50, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Meat or sock, there's definitely something coordinated going on. And if it's not Editorofthepag1, it's likely to be MacauWizard1. Primefac (talk) 12:54, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
​—DoRD (talk)​ 13:06, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]