NNcNannara (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
"I have contributed more than any other single person on the topic of AVL Trees. These contributions have been deleted under the rule WP:NOTREPOSITORY. Given that the AVL Theorem is the main theorem of computer science, I believe that this is tantamount to banning all code on Wikipedia. Is that right? Have you banned all code in Wikipedia?
If you wish Wikipedia to be of use to programmers, you will lift the ban and restore the deleted pages.
How can my 'actions' not demonstrate the point when there are no 'actions' because I am blocked? This is completely irrational.
My only 'actions' are emails pointing out that the definition of Balance Factor on the main AVL Page is flawed. Furthermore, there are paragraphs relating to split and join which are just rubbish. When I see such in Wikipedia my natural urge is to fix the problems (however I am blocked).
Sandstein falsely claimed that I am focused solely on the DRV. The DRV is history and I have moved on. Tell me, precisely why then I am being blocked."
Decline reason:
Yes, code itself does not belong on Wikipedia; this is not a code repository. We also don't put texts of books, recipes, etc on Wikipedia; there are other and better places than that. You've only been blocked for two weeks; you've contributed nothing to Wikipedia proper since last June. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇 23:39, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.